The consolidation wave in the legal profession: why legaltech is the inflection point

The consolidation wave in the legal profession is often framed as a strategic choice: firms that simply “want to get bigger.” In reality, consolidation is rarely a choice. It is usually an outcome - the result of a profession facing shifting client expectations, structural talent pressure, limited room for long-term investment, and a technological leap that now touches the core of legal work. A true perfect storm.

1) A law firm’s economics are changing faster than the traditional model can keep up

Across many practices, it’s becoming harder to make the traditional model (hours × rate) grow in line with what clients increasingly expect: transparency, predictability, speed, and consistent quality.

That’s the tension: when revenue is directly tied to time, there is less natural incentive to invest structurally in efficiency and innovation. At the same time, investment needs are rising in areas that used to feel “nice to have” but are now table stakes: cybersecurity, compliance, operations, marketing, knowledge management, and a real HR structure.

Firms that can fund and organize these investments gain economies of scale. And once scale becomes a real advantage, the market starts moving toward consolidation - because staying small without a professional “engine” becomes harder and harder.

2) The real game changer: language becomes scalable

Historically, “tech in legal” lived mostly in the back office: document management, billing, CRM. Valuable, but not transformative for the core output.

That has shifted. With AI, technology moves into the heart of the craft: analysis, structuring, argumentation, and drafting. And because lawyers produce language, this changes the production function of a firm: what used to be largely linear (more matters = more hours) becomes partially acceleratable—as long as it’s implemented properly and kept controllable.

That’s the inflection point: not “another tool,” but a new way legal value can be produced.

3) From individual excellence to systemic excellence

The profession has always relied on individual excellence: the senior who “sees it,” the specialist who “writes it,” the partner who “sets the line.” That remains crucial - but in a market that demands more speed, transparency, and consistency, individual excellence alone is no longer a sufficient operating model.

Competitive advantage shifts to firms that can:

• get to the core of complex matters faster,
• repeat quality across teams,
• capture and reuse knowledge,
• and institutionalize performance through processes, templates, and quality controls.

AI doesn’t just accelerate this - it also exposes where the system isn’t ready: messy files, fragmented know-how, missing standards, too much rework. Firms that fix that build a durable edge.

4) Trust becomes the decisive factor

In legal, speed is never the end goal. The end goal is certainty. That’s why the key question isn’t whether AI is faster, but whether AI can be used responsibly.

The winners won’t be the firms that simply “turn AI on,” but the firms that embed AI into a workflow with:

• clear control points,
• traceability (where did this come from?),
• governance around quality and confidentiality,
• and a lawyer who always remains in command.

Without that, AI is a gimmick. With it, AI becomes infrastructure.

5) Why this accelerates consolidation

Once technology accelerates core work and forces firms to professionalize, a structural gap emerges:

• Firms that treat processes, knowledge, and technology as infrastructure can deliver faster and more consistently.
• Firms that don’t feel increasing pressure—on margins, talent, client experience, and risk.

Consolidation then isn’t a “strategy.” It’s the outcome of a market where scale, organization, and technology increasingly determine who can compete.

That’s the game changer: technology doesn’t replace the lawyer - it makes it possible to organize legal quality in a new way, and to compete on a new level.

‍