The Argument Builder: the missing link in litigation

Every lawyer knows this moment. The facts are on the table. The law is clear. But turning both into a persuasive, airtight argument? That’s where the real work begins. It’s the bridge between what happened and what should be decided. And it’s where litigation is won or lost.

Traditionally, building that bridge is slow and messy. Hours are spent aligning case law with doctrine, matching evidence with legal principles, rewriting the same points across drafts, double-checking citations. It’s work that demands focus, but it’s also highly repetitive. And every gap - every missed citation, every overlooked fact - becomes a weakness that the opposing side will exploit.

That’s the problem Argument Builder solves.

Alice doesn’t just analyse your case files. It helps you transform them into structured legal reasoning. Starting from the source material, it identifies which legal principles are in play. It then connects them with the right evidence: emails, contracts, expert reports, testimony. Finally, it proposes a clear and logical structure - claim, supporting points, conclusion - in a format that is immediately usable in a draft.

The key difference is that every argument remains verifiable. No floating claims, no “black box.” Each point is grounded in a citation to the law or a document in the case file. Lawyers remain firmly in control: Alice suggests, the lawyer approves.

The impact is tangible. Arguments gain a new level of consistency because each one is built on the same structured foundation, leaving no cracks or gaps that can be exploited. They are produced at speed, since the hours once lost to cross-referencing and rewriting are reduced to minutes. And they sharpen the lawyer’s focus: instead of being buried in repetitive groundwork, lawyers can dedicate their time to what truly matters - refining strategy, anticipating counterarguments, and convincing the judge.

With Argument Builder, drafting no longer begins with a blank page. It begins with a reasoning engine that has already mapped facts to law and organised the scaffolding of the argument. The lawyer’s role shifts from builder to architect: shaping, strengthening, and deploying the reasoning where it has the most impact.

This is more than a productivity gain. It’s a new standard for how arguments are constructed. When every reasoning is sourced, structured, and transparent, litigation becomes less about finding time to build arguments - and more about proving why those arguments should win.

The future of litigation will not just be written. It will be built.