Built for trust: how Alice makes every legal output verifiable

A new standard in transparency and trust for AI-assisted legal work

In the legal profession, nothing matters more than credibility. Whether you're drafting an argument, interpreting case law, or referencing doctrine — what you write must be legally sound, transparent, and defensible — from the first line to the final footnote.

That’s why Alice was designed differently.

Where other tools aim for speed, Alice aims for trust. It doesn’t just help you draft legal documents faster. It helps you understand, verify, and confidently stand behind what you submit. Because in legal work, speed is only valuable if it's backed by certainty.

‍

The challenge: Black-box AI and unverifiable output

Many so-called “legal AI” tools on the market today promise to summarize case law, suggest clauses, or generate arguments — but offer little insight into how those results were produced.

• You get conclusions, but no legal foundation.
• You get names of cases, but not the reasoning.
• You get speed, but no accountability.

This black-box approach is not only frustrating — it’s dangerous. As a lawyer, you remain responsible for the end product, even if technology helped produce it. That means unverifiable output isn't just a bad user experience — it's a liability.

‍

The Alice difference: Built for legal accountability

Alice is built with a radically different philosophy:
Every output must be checkable. And double-checkable.

Here’s how it works:

1. Built-in traceability to legal sources:

Every reference to doctrine, case law or principle in Alice is fully sourced. With just one click, you can:

• View the exact passage from a judgment or commentary
• Understand why it was included (not just that it was)
• Verify the legal relevance to your specific case

No more scanning 80-page PDFs to find a footnote. Alice puts the reasoning where it belongs: next to your argument.

2. Transparent legal reasoning

Each paragraph generated by Alice follows a clear structure: legal condition → relevant facts → application → conclusion.

This logic is never hidden — you can always retrace how Alice arrived at its answer. Want to tweak it? You can revise each step individually, without rewriting the entire argument.

3. Double validation in a single workflow

What makes Alice truly unique is that it enables two levels of control at once:

• First check: Alice ensures legal output is grounded in facts and law
• Second check: You can inspect and adjust sources, logic, and emphasis

It's not just human-in-the-loop. It’s lawyer-in-command.

Why this matters for your practice

Trust isn't just a feeling — it's a workflow.
When you can see how an argument was built, when you can trace every statement to its legal source, and when you can adapt the logic to match your style and strategy… you work faster, better, and with peace of mind.

This check-and-double-check functionality is especially valuable when:

• You need to justify your conclusions to a client or court
• You work in complex, doctrine-heavy matters
• You collaborate with junior lawyers or external counsel
• You want to audit your reasoning before filing

In each of these scenarios, Alice offers what other tools don’t: verifiable legal thinking.

‍

Designed by lawyers, for lawyers

We know how high the bar is — because we’ve been there. Alice was built by legal professionals who’ve drafted pleadings, reviewed judgments, and spent hours reconciling doctrine with facts. We didn’t build a toy. We built a tool we would trust.

That’s why every output Alice generates is not only fast — it's structured, sourced, and testable.

Because in the end, it’s not about what AI can write. It’s about what you can confidently sign.